• This is a rush transcript from "Your World With Neil Cavuto," January 6, 2009. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

    NEIL CAVUTO, HOST: Are taxpayers getting their money's worth from their bailout bucks?

    Former AIG chief Hank Greenberg just firing off a letter to AIG's board. He's ticked off that the insurer, which has already gotten the 152 billion bucks from the government, is looking to sell off one of its units at a fire-sale price.

    Hank Greenberg joining me right now in an exclusive chat.

    Always good to see you, my friend. Happy new year.

    Video: Watch Neil's exclusive interview


    CAVUTO: The gist of this was, you think they are — they are acting recklessly and in an alarming way, right? They're just giving stuff away.

    GREENBERG: Well, in this environment, it is pretty hard to get fair value for assets. And it is the wrong strategy. You should be building AIG to pay back the taxpayer.

    CAVUTO: But you wouldn't sell anything?

    GREENBERG: Not now.

    CAVUTO: Really?

    GREENBERG: Really.


    CAVUTO: ... so distressed that it...

    GREENBERG: Yes. Why would you sell it now at a giveaway price?

    CAVUTO: So, you would until times improve before you would start.


    GREENBERG: You need a longer-term period to pay back the government at a fair interest rate and take the government down from 79.9 percent, which essentially nationalized the company. Bring them down to 15 percent. That's twice what Citigroup has given the government. Why would you have such differences in plans? Why would Citigroup.

    CAVUTO: Well, what has happened to the $150 billion, $160 billion AIG has gotten?

    GREENBERG: Well, I can't tell you. But I don't think it's all — I think that's a lump number. Part of is commercial paper that no longer exists really. And most everybody is getting commercial paper from the Fed, because there is no commercial paper market to speak of.

    CAVUTO: But you know this stuff inside and out, but to help our viewers out, and stepping back, they look at this — a lot of taxpayers look at this thing and say, my gosh. AIG has gotten all of this money, and it's still a hurting puppy. So, maybe we should just — you know, we're digging a hole. Just stop digging. Stop giving money to entities like AIG. Stop giving money, period.

    GREENBERG: Look, what is the role of government in this?

    It seems to me that you want to — the first thing, you want to pay back the taxpayer, OK? Pay them back over a period of time at a fair rate of interest. Do not expect the government to try and make a lot of money on the deal. What you want to do is get the company back so it's a taxpayer and an employer. Isn't that what we are trying to do? Isn't that what we should be trying to do?

    CAVUTO: But isn't a goal that we do not want a major U.S. financial firm to go under? That is our more immediate issue.


    CAVUTO: Let me ask you this.


    CAVUTO: Do you think, with all this help, the direction AIG is going, it will still go under?

    GREENBERG: Well, I think it depends who is managing the company.


    CAVUTO: Well, you do not flip over the management now.

    GREENBERG: Say again?

    CAVUTO: You do not flip over the management now.



    CAVUTO: This was a very nasty letter you sent.

    GREENBERG: Oh, I thought it was a pretty — it thought it was a very good letter, actually.

    CAVUTO: Well, a good letter, but it was nasty.

    GREENBERG: It wasn't nasty. I was asking some questions that any major shareholders would want to have answered.