Krauthammer on Hillary Campaign Health Cover-up: "These people are simply incapable of telling truth."

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer said Monday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” that Hillary Clinton's Campaign should have been honest about the presidential nominee's health from the beginning.  "I think this is another case of the cover up being worse than the crime. If it is what they say it is, this is totally benign.  The should have explained it right away and this just, as everybody can see, it just adds to the  impression that these people are simply  incapable of telling truth."

Krauthammer added that by not telling the truth about simple things makes Hillary look bad.

"They just find a way to make themselves make her look untrustworthy and that's where the damage is." 

Rogan: Trump and Clinton Commander and Chief Forum Performance "a lot to be disappointed about."

Columnist for the National Review, Tom Rogan said Thursday on "Special Report with Bret Baier" that both the Donald Trump and Hillary campaigns should be "disappointed" about their performances on the Commander and Chief Forum Wednesday night. 

“I think both candidates, both campaigns quite frankly have quite a lot to be disappointed about last night."

Rogan said that both candidates had to explain statements they made in the forum the following day.  Hillary Clinton had to set the record straight about having troops in Iraq and Donald Trump stated that he really wasn't for the war in Iraq, despite statements he made to the contrary on the Howard Stern show.

Rogan went on to say that Trump and Clinton used the forum to show how the other candidate was not fit to be the Commander and chief.

"Clearly Hillary Clinton is trying to make that her Pivot, that you can't trust Donald Trump in any sense of sitting in

that situation room on the flip side, Donald Trump saying you can't trust Hillary Clinton because of the decisions she has made."

Rogan said that as the election is heating up and that the candidates will be  "increasingly unrestrained" in the coming days and weeks.  

Krauthammer: Expectation management out of control for Clinton & Trump

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer believes the Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump campaigns are “out of control” when it comes to discussing each other’s candidacy.

“Either side needs to be a little bit careful,” Krauthammer said Wednesday on Special Report.

The discussion occurred after a clip played of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange telling Sean Hannity Tuesday night that Hillary Clinton was lying about not recognizing classified markings on emails and there’s the possibility of more Clinton leaks soon.

“The democrats are rightly afraid of what shoe could drop,” said Krauthammer. “The expectations are building that there’s a bombshell.”

Krauthammer added because Clinton has painted Trump as a sort of “Doctor Strangelove mad man” all Trump has do is show up at the debates and not froth at the mouth and he’ll have won it hands down.”


Krauthammer: Trump rising poll numbers not surprising

A new CNN poll shows Donald Trump leading Hillary Clinton by two points, which syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer believes should not come as a surprise.

“I don’t think this is really complicated,” Krauthammer said Tuesday on Special Report. “Every bit of news about her is always about emails, the foundation, the corruption.”

“Of course it’s her numbers declining,” he stated.

Krauthammer told the panel what he found most interesting though was Trump’s support among republicans jumped to 90 percent in the CNN poll after previously being in the high 70s.

“That’s a huge difference,” he said adding “if it shows up in the other polls, that will make a big difference.”



Krauthammer on Obama Administration Iran Payment: “Can they not stop lying about this?”

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer  said Wednesday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” that the Obama Administration’s acknowledgement it paid $1.3 billion in interest to Iran just days after sending the $400 million hard currency raises the question “can they not stop lying about this?”

The Obama administration acknowledged on Wednesday paying $1.3 billion in interest to Iran in January, two days after sending $400 million in cash to Teheran as principal to settle a decades old dispute over undelivered military equipment. On January 17 the administration sent the $400 million in cash - a combination of foreign currency, including euros -  but the move has been scrutinized since it was used as leverage for the release of four Americans held prisoner by Iran. The administration has maintained that the payment was not a ransom for the four Americans  as critics allege, and the State Department would not elaborate on the January 19 payment due to diplomatic concerns.

In a press conference August 4, President Obama said “we do not have a banking relationship with Iran that we couldn't send them a check and we could not wire the money. And it is not at all clear to me why it is that cash, as opposed to a check or a wire transfer, has made this into a new story. “

But Krauthammer says the revelation that the administration was send funds – not hard currency -  to Iran just two days later raises more questions than it answers: “The president says that we have to send the 400 million in cash because we don't have a banking relationship and we can't write a check. Two days later, they wire the money or they send a check through the banking system, uh, and you say we couldn't do it because of sanctions, well the sanctions were still in place two days later.

“This is one lie after another, and it's an administration attempting to cover its tracks, not because anything illegal happened here, although that's possible, but because it's hugely embarrassing. And it just, I mean Iran has been taking advantage of this knowing that this administration can be walked all over humiliated be forced to abandon all its red lines, for example can launch missiles, we say and do nothing, with impunity.”

Rosen: Evidence in Hillary’s Email Scandal

James Rosen discussed Hillary Clinton’s email scandal Tuesday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” saying the FBI “made very clear that their investigation was limited to the handling of the classified information and not even the content of the emails” and in regards to the Clinton Foundation “the FBI demurred on that point.”

While challenging his fellow panelist Charles Krauthammer, Rosen added, “he states that there isn't yet any evidence that have been arrayed of any kind of actual pay for play except for the facetimes and the meetings and the phone calls.”

Questions about Hillary Clinton’s email practices as Secretary of State have dogged Clinton's White House run and triggered an FBI probe that found she was “extremely careless” with sensitive information by using a private server but recommended against bringing charges.

While Clinton leads in the polls nationally and key battleground states, the flood of stories regarding her private email server and donations to the Clinton Foundation demonstrate the former secretary of state won't be able to completely outrun voter skepticism.


Hayes: Clinton was ‘lying’ about Clinton Foundation favors

Fox News Contributor Stephen Hayes told viewers of "Special Report with Bret Baier” Monday that it is clear Hillary Clinton lied about The Clinton Foundation’s ties to the State Department.
“People are gonna try to dress this up and use all sorts of euphemisms for what she was doing to avoid saying she was lying,” said Hayes. 
A newly released email shows Bahrain was granted a meeting with the former Secretary of State after reaching out to The Clinton Foundation.
According to Hayes, the uproar over this issue will ultimately get blamed on Republicans.
“This isn't about Republicans,” said Hayes. “This is about Hillary Clinton having made repeated representations that have turned out to be false and we're seeing evidence that they were false in black and white.”

Charles Lane on Trump changing course on immigration, NATO: ‘Tacit concessions to his critics’

Washington Post opinion writer Charles Lane said Monday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s pronouncement that, under his immigration policy, those who support hatred or bigotry will not be admitted to the United States was, in a word, ironic.

“This is a guy who, by Paul Ryan's account, made a racist statement about a federal judge based on his Mexican heritage and now is… calling for only admitting people who are free of intolerance. Very interesting,” he said.

More broadly, Lane said Trump’s comments in Youngtown, OH on immigration and supporting the NATO alliance were “tacit concessions to his critics.”

“The whole thing is revealing in it is backtracking. He is backtracking on the original Muslim ban, and now is sort of recasting it as extreme vetting based on values,” Lane said, adding, “Same as NATO, which he disparaged over and over again, and now he's talking about how great NATO is. He can say what he wants, but all of that is a result of the negative blowback his campaign suffered because of those previous statements.”

Krauthammer: Trump gave ‘classic Republican agenda’ in economic speech

Charles Krauthammer told “Special Report with Bret Baier” viewers Monday that he thought Trump handled his major economic speech “reasonably well.”

“He gave the classic Republican agenda on economics: cut taxes. I think every Republican would agree,” said Krauthammer.

Trump previewed his economic plans during his Detroit speech, but also spent a large amount of the time attacking the policies of Hillary Clinton, his opponent, and attempted to paint her as a candidate of the past.

Krauthammer said what stood out to him is how strongly Trump reiterated his anti-trade stances.

“He's to the left of [Clinton] on trade and that leaves us with an election where there's nobody to defend trade,” said Krauthammer. “This is new in modern American political history.”

Krauthammer: Cash payment to Iran was “money laundering”

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer told viewers on Special Report with Bret Baier that the $400 million of cash airlifted to Iran that coincided with the release of four US American hostages was "illegal." 

The State Department insisted that the payment was an installment for a failed arms deal from 1979 .

"It isn't only that they are just looking ridiculous in denying that it was a quid pro quo.  Obviously it wasn't a coincidence," Krauthammer said.

Iranian press reported that the delivery was ransom payment for the release of US prisoners, and one of the reasons the justice department raised objection to the deal. 

"There is a statute that prohibits us from engaging in Iran dealing with dollars so they had to print the money here, ship it over to Switzerland, turn it into Swiss francs and euros and ship it over to Iran."

"If a private company had done this, this is called money laundering. The CEO would be in jail right now," Krauthammer said . 



Coming Up

Starting Sunday, September 11 at 8 p.m. ET join Bret Baier for a wrap up of the Sunday shows and a look forward to the week ahead

Tonight's All-Star Panel

  • Howard Kurtz @HowardKurtz
  • Leslie Marshall @LeslieMarshall
  • Jonah Goldberg @JonahNRO

Premium Podcasts

Missed the All-Star Panel on Special Report with Bret Baier? You can now get a daily audio podcast of Fox News Channel's Special Report All-Star Panel.

Monthly Subscription
Yearly Subscription